Breast Density Can Affect Accuracy of Mammograms - The Hartford Courant, Sunday, October 5, 2014.10/5/2014
0 Comments
October is Breast Cancer Awareness Month...be sure to check out a special pull-out section on "Breast Cancer Awareness" in this coming Sunday's Hartford Courant. An article on Dense Breast Tissue will be included, featuring Nancy Cappello, PhD., Jan Kritzman, and myself.
Published in today's New York Times..."Dense Breasts May Obscure Mammogram Results". Our hometown hero Nancy Cappello is recognized!
Click here to view the article. Hundreds participated in the annual Race for the Cure at Bushnell Park in Hartford this past Saturday. It is always an inspirational event to see men, women and children, of all ages, supporting such a worthy cause. This year, as in years past, Gabrielle and I ran for Team P & J and were proud to be a part of such an amazing group of people. Congratulations to Patty & Jeanne for another successful year! Team P & J was once again a top fundraiser for the event, collecting over $15,000. Well done ladies!!! "We live here. We race here. We save lives here." Susan G. Komen Race for the Cure Hartford June 7, 2014 Join us for the annual Susan G. Komen Race for the Cure at Bushnell Park, Saturday, June 7th! We will be there supporting Patty Fox as a member and sponsor of Team P&J. If you would like to be a part of this great event and Patty's team, click here to register .
This year, official team caps will be on sale at The Crown Market on Sunday, June 1st, beginning at 9:30 am. All proceeds go towards Patty's team and the fight against breast cancer. Thank you for your support and we hope to see you there! Julie & Gabrielle Gershon A great article published in today's Op Ed section of the Wall Street Journal! Take a look... Click here for article! J Gershon Breast Imaging is now offering genetic consults and genetic testing in cooperation with Myriad Genetics Laboratories. If you, or a family member, have been diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer, or you are of Ashkenazi Jewish descent, you may be eligible for genetic testing. Knowledge of a mutation in the BRCA genes can be helpful in making informed decisions about care for oneself and your family members. To find out more about our new service, please feel free to call the office at 860-673-1955. For those who have heard of 3D mammography, and those who have not yet, I would like to share some information I learned at the American College of Radiology’s National Conference on Breast Cancer. 3D mammography, also known as digital breast tomosynthesis, is a relatively new technology, however it is currently not FDA approved as an alternative to standard 2D mammography. The 3D mammogram is obtained with an x-ray unit that moves in an “arc” around the breast taking multiple images which are then reconstructed by a computer into a 3D image. The goal of the technology is to allow the radiologist a clearer visualization the breast tissue at multiple levels with the hope of improving mammographic interpretations. The main advantage of breast tomosynthesis is that it reduces patient call-backs, with the hope of decreasing patient anxiety. Patients benefiting most from 3D imaging are those with dense breast tissue, as this is where the abnormalities hide. However, more is not always better, and there are many reasons why I am not fully supportive of breast tomosynthesis. Firstly, every patient that undergoes a 3D mammogram also needs a 2D mammogram, so patient radiation dose is doubled. Secondly, calcifications are are not well seen on 3D images, as they become blurred in the imaging process. Thirdly, in dense breast patients, ultrasound is still commonly needed as an additional study to further evaluate a 3D finding. And finally, insurance is currently not paying for breast tomosynthesis. While digital breast tomosynthesis may be of use in certain cases, I do not see an advantage for its use routinely at this time. With regards to decreasing patient anxiety, I feel the best way to remedy this issue is to speak to the patient and discuss the mammographic results at the time of exam. And for patients with increased breast density, we are fortunate to live in a state where breast density is acknowledged and where insurance will pay for a screening breast ultrasound. In dense breast patients, a full-field digital 2D mammogram and bilateral breast ultrasound is the best way to screen for breast cancer, and there is no added radiation! When choosing a breast imaging center, it is important to be aware of the various types of mammography being offered and to make an educated decision about the type of care you wish to receive. Julie S. Gershon, M.D. Our current society is one of a “digital” age. Almost everything we do on a day-to-day basis involves some form of digital media. Over the years radiology imaging has joined the digital era and “films” have become a word of the past. The first full-field digital mammography unit was approved by the FDA in 2000. Since that time, the number of facilities converting to full-field digital mammography has multiplied rapidly. There are two types of digital mammography; full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and computed radiography (CR). CR units were introduced as a less-expensive alternative to FFDM, as offices could modify older screen-film mammography equipment and convert the images into a digital format. However, it has been found that the cancer detection rates are lower with CR vs. FFDM. CR was found to be 21% less effective than FFDM in detecting cancer.(1) A recent comparative study found that FFDM has significantly better image quality with regards to tissue coverage, compression, exposure, contrast, and resolution.(2) Women with dense breast tissue benefit significantly from FFDM, as the tissue is more clearly visualized and calcifications are more sharply delineated. In addition to improved quality and better cancer detection with FFDM, there is less radiation per image, 22%, when compared to film-screen mammography.(3) When choosing a mammography center, it is important to know exactly what type of mammogram you will be undergoing. There is “digital” imaging and there is “full-field” digital imaging. Be sure to ask what type of mammogram you will be receiving and choose your mammography center wisely. As the benefits of FFDM outweigh CR, why sacrifice your care when you can have the best there is to offer?! Julie S. Gershon, M.D. Breast Imaging Specialist (1) "Digital Compared with Screen-Film Mammography: Performance Measures in Concurrent Cohorts within an Organized Breast Screening Program." Collaborating with Dr. Chiarelli were Sarah A. Edwards, M.H.Sc., Maegan V. Prummel, M.P.H., Derek Muradali, M.D., Vicky Majpruz, M.Sc., Susan J. Done, M.B., B.Chir., Patrick Brown, Ph.D., Rene S. Shumak, M.D., and Martin J. Yaffe, Ph.D. The study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research-Radiology May 2013 (2) "A Comparative Study of Computed Radiography-based Mammography Using Digital Phosphor Storage Plate and Full Field Digital Mammography” Chelliah KK, Tamanang S, Bt Elias LS, Ying KY - Indian J Med Sci. 13 Oct. 2013. (3) "Comparison of Acquisition Parameters and Breast Dose in Digital Mammography and Screen-Film Mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial” R. Edward Hendrick, Etta D. Pisano, Alice Averbukh, Catherine Moran, Eric A. Berns , Martin J. Yaffe, Benjamin Herman, Suddhasatta Acharyya and Constantine Gatsonis-American Journal of Roentgenology: Vol. 194, No. 2 (AJR) Feb. 2010. |
AuthorJulie S. Gershon, M.D. Archives
October 2023
Categories |